RyanRo24 Report post Posted January 30, 2017 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destructo Report post Posted January 30, 2017 The long-awaited mid-engine redevelopment. Could be a game-changer, that's for sure. I'll be curious to see what happens to the price. Especially if they make this the base and not a halo-model in tandem with the other models. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobberBaron Report post Posted February 1, 2017 Hello everyone, I am curious what everyone's thoughts on the upcoming mid-engined C8 are? With the already impressive performance coming from the C7 (notably the Z 0 6), this thing should be a monster!! Cheers, RobberBaron Link: http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mid-engine-.../#slide-4420674 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abolfaz Report post Posted February 1, 2017 repost & merged. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobberBaron Report post Posted February 1, 2017 repost & merged. No worries, I never saw the other thread. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ztnedman1 Report post Posted February 2, 2017 It's going to be a Cadillac. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kinnsella Report post Posted February 2, 2017 Are they going to continue to make a front-engined design as well? If they only do a mid-engined car, this kinda has the last gen Viper feel to it. Went too far upmarket and cooked the goose. I guess if they went with a Caddy and Halo Chevy model while contining the base front engine design, I could see it working. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acewhip Report post Posted February 2, 2017 Looks like the old NSX... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cabbe Report post Posted February 2, 2017 Hope it looks like this! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earlycat Report post Posted February 2, 2017 Hello everyone, I am curious what everyone's thoughts on the upcoming mid-engined C8 are? With the already impressive performance coming from the C7 (notably the Z 0 6), this thing should be a monster!! Cheers, RobberBaron Link: http://www.autoblog.com/photos/mid-engine-.../#slide-4420674 What I'v been told is a price around 150k, no idea if it's still a stick. Probably not. The McClaren is the target for performance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobberBaron Report post Posted February 3, 2017 What I'v been told is a price around 150k, no idea if it's still a stick. Probably not. The McClaren is the target for performance. Really? That is an interesting move by Chevy. If it has crazy performance and they continue to improve the interior (I think the C7's is great, but I guess not all agree), it will rock the boat. I am excited to see where this goes. I would be bummed if it ends up being some Caddy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoleIt Report post Posted February 3, 2017 I hope it isn't a Corvette. Brand it a Caddy or call it something else...but they will burn so many bridges calling it a POS. And I agree with kinnsella that them pricing it far above current levels will not go well and quickly follow the financial boondoggle that was/is the Viper. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smash Boy Report post Posted February 3, 2017 I hope it isn't a Corvette. Brand it a Caddy or call it something else...but they will burn so many bridges calling it a POS. And I agree with kinnsella that them pricing it far above current levels will not go well and quickly follow the financial boondoggle that was/is the Viper. I think the Corvette moniker can be applied if the base front engined car remains. I like the Caddy idea to an extent......they've never made a true sports car before, so that might be an issue. The Viper wasn't even a Chrysler or some fabricated luxury brand, simply Dodge. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ztnedman1 Report post Posted February 3, 2017 I think the Corvette moniker can be applied if the base front engined car remains. I like the Caddy idea to an extent......they've never made a true sports car before, so that might be an issue. The Viper wasn't even a Chrysler or some fabricated luxury brand, simply Dodge. While caddy has never made a sports car they did make the cien concept car. GM is trying to move Cadillac even more upstream. The Corvette was the 4th highest selling sports car last year even above the GTI and WRX. It would be suicide to upset the sales success the brand has by eliminating a 60k car. With the return of Cadillac to Endurance racing I think the writing is on the wall. Corvette maintains its place, caddy gets a boost. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VCR Report post Posted February 3, 2017 Why not do both to test the market? Do a hardcore no thrill sport/track-oriented version, give it a bow-tie and call it a Chevy. Then do one with all the gizmos, gadgets and bells & whistles (luxury sports cruiser?) and call it a Caddy. Not that GM hadn't done it before; remember the Chevy Cavalier and the Caddy Cimarron; or the Opel O'mega and the Caddy Catera. Let's hope they get this one right if they proceed with the idea though. EDIT: LOL, I see that the filter still stands for the word O'mega (try spelling it the traditional way. ). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrDoctor Report post Posted February 3, 2017 If they release it as a Corvette, it will sell. If they release it as a Cadillac, values will tank. I can understand staying traditional with Corvette and trying something new under Cadillac, makes sense. But I think buyers at that price point for sport cars aren't looking at Cadillac. Could be wrong, but usually that receipe doesn't work for some reason. With GM and Corvette, you have the branding, the race history, etc. Imagine if Ford tried to release the GT 40 as a Lincoln? Just wouldn't work. Should stay under GM/Corvette. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ztnedman1 Report post Posted February 3, 2017 If they release it as a Corvette, it will sell. If they release it as a Cadillac, values will tank. I can understand staying traditional with Corvette and trying something new under Cadillac, makes sense. But I think buyers at that price point for sport cars aren't looking at Cadillac. Could be wrong, but usually that receipe doesn't work for some reason. With GM and Corvette, you have the branding, the race history, etc. Imagine if Ford tried to release the GT 40 as a Lincoln? Just wouldn't work. Should stay under GM/Corvette. Ford GT was already linked to Ford, no sense in changing that. Lincoln has never been raced in endurance racing either while Cadillac had been in LMP, DPi, and GT for many years now. The last time they were in the top class they came out with the cien concept. Now that they are back I expect them to try to capitalize on that. The LFA did fine afaik, at a higher price point and Lexus is no racing brand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerplop Report post Posted February 3, 2017 Only took them a few decades. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxeous Report post Posted February 4, 2017 I actually disagree with the notion that it should be a Chevy - the brand is not upscale enough to warrant a $150k vehicle where as Cadillac could. The Sixteen is still one of the most beautiful car designs I have ever seen. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griza Report post Posted February 4, 2017 Why not just have it as a new model altogether and not have it associated with being a Corvette? Leave the Corvette where it always has been and bring this new mid engined vehicle in as the ultimate Chevy sports car. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
emanon Report post Posted February 5, 2017 Why not do both to test the market? Do a hardcore no thrill sport/track-oriented version, give it a bow-tie and call it a Chevy. Then do one with all the gizmos, gadgets and bells & whistles (luxury sports cruiser?) and call it a Caddy. Not that GM hadn't done it before; remember the Chevy Cavalier and the Caddy Cimarron; or the Opel O'mega and the Caddy Catera. Let's hope they get this one right if they proceed with the idea though. EDIT: LOL, I see that the filter still stands for the word O'mega (try spelling it the traditional way. ). I'm surprised they haven't done this already. It's worked pretty well with the Tahoe/Suburban then introducing the Denali and Escalade lines and those get close to $100k. I don't see any reason they can't do this as a higher end option. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank-Goodson Report post Posted February 6, 2017 A mid-engine would be interesting. I wonder what would the pricing be... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.