WheelsRCool Report post Posted July 16, 2009 RIP, she shouldn't have had children at that age IMO! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falken Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Geesh didnt she just have them like a year ago? why would they be orphaned...didnt she have them with somebody? or did she knock herself up with donor sperm? either way sucks for the kids...what woman would want to be pregnant and chasing babies at 69 anyways?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assman Report post Posted July 16, 2009 Geesh didnt she just have them like a year ago? why would they be orphaned...didnt she have them with somebody? or did she knock herself up with donor sperm? either way sucks for the kids...what woman would want to be pregnant and chasing babies at 69 anyways?! 69 year old women can not have kids with sperm, they have to have IVF of embryo's. Their eggs would be no good either, so the kids would not be biologically hers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
72Pantera Report post Posted July 16, 2009 She was the world's oldest mom when she had the kids at 66. Now she is dead at 69. I think they are pretty sure that the hormone treatments for her pregnancy caused the cancer that killed her. There is a woman right now trying to have kids at 72. It seams like the height of selfishness to me. - Robert Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentS Report post Posted July 16, 2009 It seams like the height of selfishness to me. These morons need to think of the poor kids and not themselves! Unbelievably selfish and cruel to have kids at that age!!! Even though I think most people 60+ are far too old, if they REALLY want to have kids bad enough then become a foster parent, or adopt some older kids. There are plenty of older kids available that no one wants. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcabron Report post Posted July 17, 2009 72? why? Just to make the record books and a bit of cheap publicity at the cost of another human life. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.