Kisco Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Here are the exact numbers: Pump: 759.5 rwhp Race: 1004.11 rwhp SingleTe46 was sooo close, being 1.5 rwhp off! Kevin is going to construct another pump gas map and possibly another race gas map. When I get those I will check and see the numbers and look back and see if anyone is within the +/- 2 rwhp. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duhawks Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Pump: 759.5 rwhp Race: 1004.11 rwhp Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2rsky Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Damn Fadi! Your numbers are impressive for 1.5! Awesome! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Damn Fadi! Your numbers are impressive for 1.5! Awesome! Thanks brother, much appreciated! I can't wait to strap the VBOX onto it. 4.5 60-130 on a 2.8% decline or I am sending it back to Kevin..lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCJR Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Some great numbers there Fadi, congrats! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Some great numbers there Fadi, congrats! Thanks Peter. Word is there is going to be a black 570 TT running around pretty soon. What a lucky guy that fella is... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIPPERTT Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Congrats brother !!! VERY nice numbers there for that setup ! You are gonna LOVE it ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Congrats brother !!! VERY nice numbers there for that setup ! You are gonna LOVE it ! Thanks, Jerry! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Nice numbers! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 20, 2013 Nice numbers! Thanks man! I am already having sleepless nights.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
medici78 Report post Posted February 20, 2013 4-digits is plenty to have serious fun. Better order up that C16 drum. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLR82XS Report post Posted February 20, 2013 4-digits is plenty to have serious fun. Better order up that C16 drum. Already taken care of. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wooosh Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Thanks brother, much appreciated! I can't wait to strap the VBOX onto it. 4.5 60-130 on a 2.8% decline or I am sending it back to Kevin..lol After seeing Houston T's 3.87 second 60 - 130 mph run, at what looks to be about 1120 whp ... Your car will certainly be under 4.5 seconds, with 1000 whp. Congrats .... Man .... That's one sweet ride .... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCJR Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Thanks Peter. Word is there is going to be a black 570 TT running around pretty soon. What a lucky guy that fella is... You mean another Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wooosh Report post Posted February 21, 2013 You mean another I remember your 570 TT Bolt-On ..... Sounds like we're about to see Part II .... I'm guessing R Version ..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasgtr Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Thanks brother, much appreciated! I can't wait to strap the VBOX onto it. 4.5 60-130 on a 2.8% decline or I am sending it back to Kevin..lol I have a feeling it will be 4.5 flat road and 4.3 2.8% decline. Unless 1000whp is not really 1000whp.. i see no reason. I ran 4.39 with 1.9% decline making 840 in my tank. good luck bro! my dream car. cant wait to see your racing videos they have always been entertaining. Enjoy it with good health. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 21, 2013 After seeing Houston T's 3.87 second 60 - 130 mph run, at what looks to be about 1120 whp ... Your car will certainly be under 4.5 seconds, with 1000 whp. Congrats .... Man .... That's one sweet ride .... Thanks wooosh, much appreciated! You mean another :icon_mrgreen: I have a feeling it will be 4.5 flat road and 4.3 2.8% decline. Unless 1000whp is not really 1000whp.. i see no reason. I ran 4.39 with 1.9% decline making 840 in my tank. good luck bro! my dream car. cant wait to see your racing videos they have always been entertaining. Enjoy it with good health. This is where it gets a little tricky...I don't think the car makes a true 1,000 whp because this was done on a rwd dyno. IMO putting the car back to AWD will net a 10% lower dyno reading. So I am thinking more like 900 awhp (On an awd dyno jet, possibly less on a awd Mustang Dyno??) So that is why I think it will be more of a 4.6-4.8 car. But on the other hand.......Peter's car went 3.8 on 1150 rwhp on the same dyno my car made 1004 rwhp on. Sooooo maybe it will go 4.5?? IDK, all speculation right now. When I get my car back the first thing I will be doing is strapping a VBOX to it to see what it can do on the SAME exact stretch that my GTR did 4.6 on (2.8% decline) Thanks for the kind words, Sam! I am looking forward to providing some vids for everyone soon! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Underground Racing Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Thanks wooosh, much appreciated! This is where it gets a little tricky...I don't think the car makes a true 1,000 whp because this was done on a rwd dyno. IMO putting the car back to AWD will net a 10% lower dyno reading. So I am thinking more like 900 awhp (On an awd dyno jet, possibly less on a awd Mustang Dyno??) So that is why I think it will be more of a 4.6-4.8 car. But on the other hand.......Peter's car went 3.8 on 1150 rwhp on the same dyno my car made 1004 rwhp on. Sooooo maybe it will go 4.5?? IDK, all speculation right now. When I get my car back the first thing I will be doing is strapping a VBOX to it to see what it can do on the SAME exact stretch that my GTR did 4.6 on (2.8% decline) Thanks for the kind words, Sam! I am looking forward to providing some vids for everyone soon! I will test it Monday when KC gets back. I wouldnt let those #s out until you take care of those races you have lined up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duhawks Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Haha we have a few races lined up. Racing 0 to 40 in reverse, who can fill their gas tank up the fastest and all sorts of stupid stuff. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VBUGKING Report post Posted February 21, 2013 great numbers Fadi. You really are going to enjoy getting back into a big power car! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FikseSTS Report post Posted February 21, 2013 I saw a 2008 stage 3 UGR car (1000 rwhp @ UGR) on a Mustang Dyno put down 865 awhp..... on the same dyno my 2008 spyder did 876 awhp, (1020 rwhp @ Heffner) both on pump gas.... about 12% in these cases.... Thanks wooosh, much appreciated! :icon_mrgreen: This is where it gets a little tricky...I don't think the car makes a true 1,000 whp because this was done on a rwd dyno. IMO putting the car back to AWD will net a 10% lower dyno reading. So I am thinking more like 900 awhp (On an awd dyno jet, possibly less on a awd Mustang Dyno??) So that is why I think it will be more of a 4.6-4.8 car. But on the other hand.......Peter's car went 3.8 on 1150 rwhp on the same dyno my car made 1004 rwhp on. Sooooo maybe it will go 4.5?? IDK, all speculation right now. When I get my car back the first thing I will be doing is strapping a VBOX to it to see what it can do on the SAME exact stretch that my GTR did 4.6 on (2.8% decline) Thanks for the kind words, Sam! I am looking forward to providing some vids for everyone soon! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Good info! So as I assumed, my car is more like a 860-870 awhp car with my set up on a MD. Fikse, did you ever 60-130 your car when it was making the 1020 rwhp? It could give me a ballpark figure where I'll be at. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vegasgtr Report post Posted February 21, 2013 Good info! So as I assumed, my car is more like a 860-870 awhp car with my set up on a MD. Fikse, did you ever 60-130 your car when it was making the 1020 rwhp? It could give me a ballpark figure where I'll be at. I think Brooks car is a Manuel.. so he losses boost between shifts. If i recall he did it in 4.8 You car is an auto so you wont lose any boost between shifts. even with 860whp on a mustang dyno the car should fly as it only weights 3300.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kisco Report post Posted February 21, 2013 I think Brooks car is a Manuel.. so he losses boost between shifts. If i recall he did it in 4.8 You car is an auto so you wont lose any boost between shifts. even with 860whp on a mustang dyno the car should fly as it only weights 3300.. Definitely weighs more than 3300 lbs. I weighed it in at 3520 with a 1/4 tank of gas before the turbos. With the turbos/IC, etc. it is probably 3550 with a 1/4 tank. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambofan35 Report post Posted February 21, 2013 I think Brooks car is a Manuel.. so he losses boost between shifts. If i recall he did it in 4.8 You car is an auto so you wont lose any boost between shifts. even with 860whp on a mustang dyno the car should fly as it only weights 3300.. No Gallardo weighs 3300lbs, lol. The lightest you will find anywhere will be close to 3500lbs Twin Turbo with a full tank of gas (Allan Lambo did have a lite one but his was an older model I think) and thats if its modded to hell to save weight (Superleggera, carbon seats, no extra accessories, etc...) The car is heavier than people think when turbo stuff is added on. I'd love to see what a Lp560 weighs stock TT, I'd bet 3650 or so. I will test it Monday when KC gets back. I wouldnt let those #s out until you take care of those races you have lined up. Is that have KC takes mine for a test Monday, lol. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.