Kim Jong Un

Yep and that is only one of about 25 known camps which are listed on the side of that wikipedia page.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Report_of_the...public_of_Korea

 

"The Commission concluded that the North Korean government was perpetrating "unspeakable atrocities" against its own people on a vast scale [39] and committing “widespread, systematic and gross”[10] violations that amounted to crimes against humanity. The Chair of the Commission called these atrocities “strikingly similar” to crimes committed by Nazi Germany in World War II.[11][33][40][41] Crimes included execution, enslavement, starvation, rape and forced abortion."

 

"Talking about these crimes, the Chair of the COI (UN) stated: "Unlike earlier totalitarian states and oppressive conduct, the world cannot now lament, 'if only we had known...' Now, the world does know. And the question is whether the world will respond effectively and take the necessary action.""

What does everyone In here think that the response will be if Kim fires missiles anywhere near the territory of Guam?

What does everyone In here think that the response will be if Kim fires missiles anywhere near the territory of Guam?

 

NK will then stand for "Nuked Korea"

What does everyone In here think that the response will be if Kim fires missiles anywhere near the territory of Guam?

 

The smart move (big picture). Smack it out of the sky like a mosquito and then do nothing. Followed up by a message along the lines of that was your one warning. Next time, our response will be to erase your existence from this planet.

 

I feel like a quiet show of strength would be well received on a world scale, without putting any other countries in a position where they have to make a lose-lose decision. Also reinforces NK's shitty bargaining position and makes it very attractive to step back in line.

The smart move (big picture). Smack it out of the sky like a mosquito and then do nothing. Followed up by a message along the lines of that was your one warning. Next time, our response will be to erase your existence from this planet.

 

I feel like a quiet show of strength would be well received on a world scale, without putting any other countries in a position where they have to make a lose-lose decision. Also reinforces NK's shitty bargaining position and makes it very attractive to step back in line.

I'd agree with taking out the rocket. Problem is that's a 50/50 proposition at best. So is it worth it if we miss? Part b of your plan is idiotic. You realize if you turn off the 10 lights running at night in NK using a nuclear strike creates so much collateral damage and potential escalation its not worth it. Therefore not credible. The only solution to this is squeezing Chinah till they stop underwriting the regime and that will come with significant economic cost to us. So on this topic Trump gets a B and would get an A if he'd park! the fire and fury destabilizing rhetoric and ramp up the sanctions. There is no military solution to this until we have reliable anti missile tech.

 

And ultimately I do not think NK will ever give up their nuclear weapons voluntarily. It is a seventy-year-old technology, it takes time to refine but it's not an iPhone. Hard part is acquiring the fissile materials. They are willing to sacrifice everything and everybody to stay in power. Think about it, the entire country is dark at night and they are developing nuclear ballistic missiles. The Americans did it before the transistor was invented, albeit with an unlimited budget...

 

 

 

This shit could get ugly really fast.

This shit could get ugly really fast.

What is the latest turn?

What is the latest turn?

 

 

It sounds like NK is serious about this guam thing.... Bad joojoo.

It sounds like NK is serious about this guam thing.... Bad joojoo.

F&ck.

 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/840825...ng-un-live-Guam

 

It sounds like NK is serious about this guam thing.... Bad joojoo.

 

 

Looks like they are lighting the candle tomorrow to celebrate some NK holiday...not going to be good.

 

 

 

dangerous sheeeeet

http://www.news.com.au/world/missile-alarm...60b718e949993fa

 

Glass these fuckers

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/14...ts-game-on.html

http://www.news.com.au/world/missile-alarm...60b718e949993fa

 

Glass these fuckers

 

Nuanced approach Rob. You do realize that 90 percent of the population are basically functioning as slaves. This from the last time nuclear weapons were used in case you need a reminder.

 

 

 

"Glassing them" will significantly damage all our allies in the region and also damage China our biggest trading partner. Russia will probably like it as it may open up more north port access. Vladivostok is an absolute shit hole, so the Russians will probably thank Trump for taking it out.

Nuanced approach Rob.

 

 

Bomb those fcuking Iranians while you're at it and eliminate those fcuking Islamists.

 

SAD!

Nuanced approach Rob. You do realize that 90 percent of the population are basically functioning as slaves. This from the last time nuclear weapons were used in case you need a reminder.

 

 

 

"Glassing them" will significantly damage all our allies in the region and also damage China our biggest trading partner. Russia will probably like it as it may open up more north port access. Vladivostok is an absolute shit hole, so the Russians will probably thank Trump for taking it out.

If these guys fire missles towards a US territory your solution is what? Feel sorry for NK?

Did you see me expressing my disgust above that there is a literal holocaust happening in the country are you trying so hard to paint a picture you'll ignore what I say when it isnt convenient for your theories?

 

 

"Mattis added that if North Korea fires at the U.S., "it could escalate into war very quickly... yes, that's called war, if they shoot at us."

General Mattis gets it, Why is Kinnsella a better military strategist?

 

Did you miss the part where China said they would not intervene in NK attacked?

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/08/11/ch...orea-first.html

 

BTW last time Nuclear weapons we're used it saved millions of more lives from death in war and instantly ended the greatest war the world has ever seen.

 

edit: im not implying we should strike first if thats what you're working towards? But if they fire at us, there should be nothing left of Pyongyang when we return volley.

BTW last time Nuclear weapons we're used it saved millions of more lives from death in war and instantly ended the greatest war the world has ever seen.

 

Japanese were on their last legs...that was a message for the Soviet Union.

Japanese were on their last legs...that was a message for the Soviet Union.

And what was the result?

edit: im not implying we should strike first if thats what you're working towards? But if they fire at us, there should be nothing left of Pyongyang when we return volley.

 

Agreed, my point is that NK is a paper tiger with a Chinese overdrawn credit card. Chinese won't let them do it.

And what was the result?

 

 

The Soviets scoured Eastern Europe and picked up every German missile and nuclear tech they could find and had a thermonuclear weapon before Stalin died. US did the same.

Bomb those fcuking Iranians while you're at it and eliminate those fcuking Islamists.

 

Wrong country...Wabbists are funded out of Saudi Arabia.

I wonder what Putin thinks about a potential nuclear war in his backyard.

 

Will make for some interesting scenery from the Dacha this year.

Wrong country...Wabbists are funded out of Saudi Arabia.

 

 

According to Trumps nsc staffers, it's the god damn Iranians!

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archiv...al-memo/535725/

According to Trumps nsc staffers, it's the god damn Iranians!

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archiv...al-memo/535725/

 

 

Of course, it is....just imagine a world in where Trump held the North Koreans and the Saudi's to the same level of scrutiny to shore up his shrinking domestic support. Military options for Venezuela...LOL. Bannon must be spinning in his high chair.

Of course, it is....just imagine a world in where Trump held the North Koreans and the Saudi's to the same level of scrutiny to shore up his domestic support.

This pisses me off too. Saudi Arabia should have been on the travel ban. We should have held them responsible for funding the 9/11 attackers by the previous two administrations as well. We could be totally energy independent of them if we chose to stop sucking at their tit. Money has truly corrupted our country that we remain allies with the largest sponsor of terror in the world and the ones who are directly responsible for the deadliest terror attack in our country. Sickening and treasonous