Shooter in Las Vegas

I’m commenting and watching in real time. He’s spot on so far.

 

 

One small issue. I think he said something about 600 yard distance. We calculated that the video I’ve shown was about half that. (Edit. This obviously becomes a big issue)

 

 

Next issue. I think he assumes all the guns. Are .223. I do not believe that’s been confirmed.

 

 

Ok. I want to know if he’s listening to my video above. Because we got a very good idea where she was when it was recorded and she was much closer. 300 yards. Ok. Does it matter?

 

 

I don’t think it does. He’s still got two guns at different locations firing at once.

 

I think though his final conclusion whatever it is will be wrong. I think Steve paddock is at 300 meters. And another shooter is FIRTHER away at 450.

 

I also believe commenter xiaoca has a great comment.

 

But. This should be the beginning. You can take this, redo it with actual facts on location, rounds etc and get a lot more accurate.

 

Agreed. The fact that there is a way to get more information figured out is the point. I wonder how long this story will drag out for. Someone has to be able to get more answers eventually. The more modern technology get the less likely there will be conspiracies with all the cameras and cell phones the public has.

There is ALOT that is unanswered and unfortunately it will go down the drain like before.

A lone nut pulling this is one thing. Shit. I’ve seen videos where people literally didn’t get up from their fcuking slot machine while the swat teams are storming in. No fucks given.

 

Two shooters means a conspiracy. A conspiracy means terrorism. Terrorist means Vegas is on the menu and tourism is fucked.

 

 

Yup well said.

 

 

Also casinos have always kept their video "private" for lack of a better word. They cover their cusotomers asses. Remember a few years back some Congressman from D.C. Was playing huge $$$ in slots, at the belligo iirc. They finally turned over the footage to the Feds, what they "could retrieve". They protect their customers identity as its bad for biz not to.

 

And yeah if it was actual terriosm-game over for tourism and that's not a option.

 

Personally my gut tells me it was one degen video poker player who went off the rails and while it's by far the biggest event of that nature it's certainly not the only video poker player who went off the rails and shot up people. Lots of family's have been mowed down in town over the years. Of course for some other reason sure....

Reminds me of the movie JAWS where the mayor tries to igore the shark because of impact on tourism.

If they know there was two shooters, I don't quite see how they could claim a lone nut doing it without having 100% control over everything picked up by cameras etc?

For all they know someone could have footage of two shooters, but they luck out and all that is picked up is sound that may or may not indicate two shooters?

 

 

I’ve yet to see ANY video of ANNY shooter/ muzzle flash. The distances are just too extreme.

 

And the FBI is particularly good and telling people that they didn’t see what they saw with their own two eyes. They’ve been doing it for 60 years.

Reminds me of the movie JAWS where the mayor tries to igore the shark because of impact on tourism.

 

 

Fantastic analogy.

 

 

Now. Consider If Amity has a tourism revenue of 60 bllion dollars per year.

https://www.facebook.com/gunpornhub/videos/539104523093788/

https://www.facebook.com/gunpornhub/videos/539104523093788/

 

 

Listen. I told you all from day one I hear a belt fed .30. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Buck roman norris once threw a grenade and killed 50 people, then it exploded.

There once was a street called Buck Norris, but the name was changed for public safety because nobody crosses Buck Norris and lives.

 

It was an avocado, not grenade.

 

Listen. I told you all from day one I hear a belt fed .30. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

Yep. It is same looking at the video.

So for all the grassy knoll theorists, where was the second shooter on the Chicago scout?

Listen. I told you all from day one I hear a belt fed .30. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

How hard would it have been for him to get his hands on one?

How hard would it have been for him to get his hands on one?

 

 

$200 tax stamp from the ATF takes about a year to get.

 

Then all you need is the $200,000 to buy a pre 1986 model.

 

http://www.urban-armory.com/cart/proddetai...p?prod=m240bend

 

 

He could afford it.

Damn. So crazy. Just such an odd investigation.

So provided this synopsis is correct, someone opened fire with a belt-fed .30 caliber machine gun, then managed to get out of there super quickly and not be caught?

Here’s some extra, the first rolls gonna run out quick in here

The comparison to "Jaws" is spot on!!!

 

 

Nothing I can add to that.

 

 

Took me 6 months to get my class 3 weapons years ago. Fwiw, I got bored with them quickly. When I moved to Vegas MP5's were $3000. lol I should have invested in them.....

So provided this synopsis is correct, someone opened fire with a belt-fed .30 caliber machine gun, then managed to get out of there super quickly and not be caught?

 

It sure sounds like somebody opened up with a belt fed thirty. It could have been in the damned room. We still don’t know what guns were there.

 

It’s now coming up that his room was not covered by camera. And that he had access to a freight elevator that also has no cameras. I find both hard to believe but if that’s the case all sorts of assumptions change.

Just a reminder. Until any official complete report has been released anything released is conjecture. When something has actually been factually written and presented can the conspiracy classification be defined.

 

 

But hey, let's not let you know, the actual facts get in the way of NCIS Lambo power.

The only winners here are the people selling tin foil.

Just a reminder. Until any official complete report has been released anything released is conjecture. When something has actually been factually written and presented can the conspiracy classification be defined.

 

 

But hey, let's not let you know, the actual facts get in the way of NCIS Lambo power.

The only winners here are the people selling tin foil.

 

 

Gives a mind something to do, don't hate.

 

 

 

 

 

It’s now coming up that his room was not covered by camera. And that he had access to a freight elevator that also has no cameras

 

 

Would tie in nicely with the hypothesis that someone in the casino works with him.

Gives a mind something to do, don't hate.

 

 

Would tie in nicely with the hypothesis that someone in the casino works with him.

So would finding the cure to cancer... which is more useful?

Just a reminder. Until any official complete report has been released anything released is conjecture. When something has actually been factually written and presented can the conspiracy classification be defined.

 

 

But hey, let's not let you know, the actual facts get in the way of NCIS Lambo power.

The only winners here are the people selling tin foil.

 

 

Chaos. You’re across the pond so you’re not seeing the cluster fcuk that’s been going on here. There HAVE been DAILY briefings by the LVMPD sheriff/under sheriff and FBI. We are getting OFFICIAL reports Daily. And in the last week they have begun to contradict themselves from what they said on day one and now what they said just the day before.

 

The mgm is now publicly and officially contradicting the revised reports as well.

 

 

Additionally the video evidence doesn’t support the current (and quickly reached) official narrative that this was a lone gunman, nothing to see here. Move along...

So there’s plenty of room to question wtf is going on here.

 

 

Just spit balling here, but if the government does have knowledge of a second shooter and/or evidence of a link to a specific person, would it not be reasonable to keep it under wraps?

It might make the tracking and capture easier if the suspect thinks they are not being hunted.

Just spit balling here, but if the government does have knowledge of a second shooter and/or evidence of a link to a specific person, would it not be reasonable to keep it under wraps?

It might make the tracking and capture easier if the suspect thinks they are not being hunted.

 

 

Might fly in Canada. Not in the US.

 

The liability of they KNEW there was a suspect at large and didn’t say anything would be enormous. Secondly you catch these guys with the help of the public. Third. The sheriff (elected) would lose all credibility and find his ass voted out for lack of transparency.

Makes sense

Thank you

Is this real? The security guard was the second shooter?

 

https://walkwithtimeamerica.com/news/breaki...-arrested-look/