Jump to content

rj1031

LP Member
  • Posts

    91
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rj1031

  1. Agreed-im sure UR will be busier than ever now that the Huracan is out....

     

    New R&D to be done!

     

    Huracan I believe has the same under-squared engine platform as the Gallardo. So not so much R&D for the engine but much for the fabrication of the turbo system.

     

    BTW, since ASS shop car demonstrated something promising for GTR customers. The win in TI gave multiple orgasms to GTR owners and I am sure the deep-pocketed ones will want some more of that. TX2K15...I'm booking my flight and hotel NOW!

  2. UR doesn't need to prove anything. Their customers have done that and then some. ASS' shop car displayed not only it won but it gave hope to GTR owners/customers that their platform still has a bright future on these events. TX2K15...I just saw the list of cars and their horsepower competing on the roll-racing event. Wow! One car stand-out was Eric G's GTR at 2100 hp...for a V6! I'm impressed!

  3. putting a 6 speed would make it a supra ..lol

     

    So you mentioned about the Supra. Not sure if you're being sarcastic but allow me to remind you one truth.

     

    The GTR will never leave a legacy not like the Supra MKIV...not even close. For the past two decades, ever since it was born, guys like SW, Saad, Ryan Woon, Dana VWR, Cody Phillips, and etc. have impacted the streets and the track with a Supra; literally dominated on every aspect. The motor, trans, and rear-end alone are pretty much bullet-proof coming out from the factory. Only until recently, when its platform was challenged by other updated platforms like the Lambos/R8s and GTRs. I do applaud on how well the Lambos/R8s/GTRs are doing but I still have deep respect on the Supra. Nero of ###### Motorpsorts is helping a customer for the next TI. I know they did well back during spring. So we'll see!

     

    Tell you what, if you take-off all the electronics, AWD and put a manual trans on the GTR then it becomes a 370z/G37. Have we seen one of these on these events? No, because they have the GTR for that. Might as well replace the steering wheel of the GTR with a PS4 controller and press start. Easy. I'm just old-school, I guess. So Sam or Vegasgtr, a little respect for those who loves to play with three pedals with a h-pattern manual shifting especially to those who are wrestling 1800+ whp, which the GTR can never have and never will be.

  4. This was from yesterday from TSS FB page...

     

    Below is a list of all drivers top indexed and 6 speed challenge speed. Passes made during open sessions are NOT included in this list. Drivers listed as "not indexed" were outside the 5 mph+/- start speed. (you still received a time slip but the times were not counted toward indexing and were not recorded)

     

    Car # Speed Driver Car

    77 195.14 Stacy Barnett TTSL

    95 191.32 Reza Koranki Lambo

    23 191 Tag Marlow TTG

    31 190.83 Ivan Phipps GTR

    70 188.6 Joel Gusman TTSL

    65 187.49 Lee Saunders Viper

    2 185.03 Mullet TTSL

    81 184.12 Daniel Castillo Corvette

    24 183.52 Viren Singh GTR

    3 183.22 Faisal Al Khaldi TTG

    39 181.15 Ricky Crossley TTG

    19 178.57 Ben Haynes GTR

    52 178 Jason Purdum GTR

    87 176.19 Mark Johnston GTR

    32 176.05 Kelly Martin Viper

    21 175.91 Elliot Presser Viper

    13 174.82 Will Dugas Supra

    84 174.55 Geovannie Castillo Supra

    8 174.28 David Chukhman TTG

    62 173.87 Tiago Salies Viper

    10 173.61 Chris Leboeuf GTR

    56 172.41 Austin Oakes GTR

    55 171.88 David Feldman Corvette

    33 169.42 Lupe Hernadez Supra

    41 169.17 Frank Volk Viper

    9 168.28 Tony Whatley Viper

    35 166.42 Joe Stetin Corvette

    40 166.17 Ivan Curiel Supra

    26 164.71 Matt Owen IS300

    93 164.47 Rick Ansay GTR

    76 163.87 Victor Lao POS

    68 163.28 Kelly Bise Corvette

    42 163.16 Rob Brooks GTR

    48 163.04 Todd Nall Porsche

    14 162.22 Casey Eveleigh Corvette

    15 161.87 Mike Davis Supra

    92 161.4 Samir Datt Supra

    54 156.79 Micah Fleshman Mustang

    60 156.46 Ronnie Hay GT500

    11 155.81 Tance Simolke Corvette

    85 155.81 John Gilliand Mustang

    71 154.85 Anthony Moreno zo6

    51 153.16 Bill Winters Corvette

    69 152.54 RC Cox ZR1

    7 150.6 Robert Williams CTSV

    36 150.4 Jeremy Albright Cobra

    46 150.4 Rob Roberts ZR1

    6 144.32 Jarrett Lott GTR

    44 144.23 Darnel Settles CTSV

    50 141.59 Robert Mecchi Porsche

    73 137.95 Kevin Johnston GT500

    90 137.11 Marco Armenta Plastic mess-06

    53 134.56 Jasmin Galeaz CTSV

    47 129.38 Melissa Weaver Corvette

    58 99.07 Austin Oakes evo

    45 96.07 Robert Varela TTG

    18 Not Indexed Tony Palo GTR

    25 Not Indexed Shin Kim GTR

    43 Not Indexed Andres Jimenez GTR

    57 Not Indexed Austin Oakes GTR

    74 Not Indexed Andy Nelson Viper

    75 Not Indexed Brandon Rockhold CTSV

    80 Not Indexed Shawn Dunn Corvette

    83 Not Indexed Tien Nguyen GTR

    88 Not Indexed JC Slayton R8TT

    89 Not Indexed Eric Ledet GTR

    333 Not Indexed Oliver Benloulou TTSL

    369 Not Indexed Oliver Benloulou TTSTrofeo

  5. Yes but there is always a tradeoff of HP per CI and how that is spread around. GTR's are fighting HP per CI more than HP per cylinder. HP per CI is a lot more a function of airflow which favors more cylinders (generally, but again it depends).

     

    As spans (block length, number of main bearings) get longer things get exponentially heavier to fight flex and maintain strength. Look at the Viper V10, big cubes in 10 cylinders and they are know for making a gazillion hp. But the stock crank weighs 90+ lbs, almost twice the weight of a small block V8 mopar crank.

     

    I think you are forgetting that the Aventador's engine is an over-squared (bigger bore and smaller stroke) configuration. Meaning less side loads on the cylinder walls and less stress on the crank and its bearings. Plus if you put a longer rod on the same stroke, it will lessens the stress on the wrist pins as well. I think it's a great platform to make gigantic power. Plus the V12's ignition timing is smoother and more balanced compared to lesser cylinder engines. To go further, you can also change the firing order to minimize vibrations.

     

    A custom Winberg or Bryant crank are lighter and stronger and will handle the more power anyone could ever imagine.

  6. One week left to TI. We will see ASS shop car, T1, BL, ER/ETS, swiss cheese?, and many others. Will be EPIC. So the question is: Are we gonna see TwinTurbo V12 (Aventadors) ??

     

    Won't be a surprise if a 2R Aventador TT show-up. When it does, competitors will be packing their bags and go home. Lol! In a serious note, the 2R and "X" package Gallardo/R8's are still dominating. We'll see in TI.

  7. Street car alert!!! Lol. Look how smooth my car takes off the line. No race car here.

     

     

    Man! There's no other car out there at the moment that can do this. Such an awesome platform! I'll be honest, I watched the video countless times and my reactions were...smh; uncomprehending to say the least. That 2nd to 3rd gear and so on acceleration must be effing crazy. What drives me even more nuts is it does not have any chute to slow it down. Now that is a "STREET CAR"!

  8. Going to 200 mph is more suited with the power you guys are playing with. The Boss mustang is one great reference on power differences between the GTR and Gallardo during highway runs. The 8.1 ET of the mustang is no joke and majority of its great time was primarily contributed from a great 60 ft. time. I rode in a low 8 sec. Supra before on the highway and I am flabbergasted how fast is accelerated. I can't even fathom how it feels like to be in a 2R or A16/20. Nevertheless, enjoy and be safe out there. :)

  9. Where did I say no power gain? I said "won't do a whole lot" which is correct. It will definitely effect the power under the curve. But for these builds there is no reason or purpose to do either of the things you suggested, granted if you are spending the money yourself you as the owner can certainly tell the builder to do it if you so choose. Was sharing an opinion was all.

     

     

    Hey man don't mean to make it more than it was. Yes, you didn't say no power gain. I was just adding and relating that there is power to be gained. I also stressed the reality of its longevity of such physical change internally. It's additional insurance as well. An Aventador is one expensive car and if a 2R or more is the goal, then I think it's better to over-engineer it. I can easily say to my tuner to have two settings...set the rev limiter at 8K for the street and 9.5K for 1/2 to 1 mile race events :) Now, gotta go to my nearest market to get some lotto tickets! lol!

  10. Honestly changing the Rod length won't do a whole lot in terms of a power gain and possibly could lessen the life of the piston in general. Being that the aventador as with most Italian performance motors already revs pretty good, that doesn't need to be changed really considering we are discussing boosting the motor. I think the Aventador can do well simply because it has more displacement and cylinders for power and torque to be spread across. I am very anxious to see what all of the Lamborghini tuners have up their sleeves, especially Underground Racing.

     

    So increasing the rod length will lessen the life of the piston? No power gain? Really? Any serious engine builder knows the benefits of this practice.

×
×
  • Create New...