Robster Craws
LP Member-
Posts
7,599 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Robster Craws
-
Yes you're right. It's unpresidential. But he's just playing the same game they're playing. It's a total distraction from the real issues. I'd love to see him cut out the press pool completely at least revoke CNN's pass after all the videos that have come out showing that they're deliberately pushing story is they know to be false and not of substance btw another fake news story from New York Times. So quick to push the story out they don't fact check it https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/25/us/po...his-allies.html
-
http://fortune.com/2017/06/26/vitalik-deat...acebook_FORTUNE
-
ZERO. Nada. Absolutely zero. And this is intended to keep it that way. Look at Europe. Unvetted, open borders allowing men who have literally fought for Isis on the front lines ( or in some cases leave Europe, Fight and then return with no issue) to stroll in and drive lorrys into crowds and blow up little girls at concerts. It isnt about what's happened in the past here in the US it's about what's happening now in other places and preventing it from happening here. A country without Borders and without knowing who's coming into your home is no country at all
-
Wow no dissenters either (to be honest though I'm not familiar enough with Supreme Court procedure to know if at this point that's how the process works) but it was a 9-0 decision to reinstate these parts of the 90 travel ban/ vetting for people coming in Edit: three dissenters dissenting because they believe the ban should be enacted in its entirety fcuk the 9th circuit
-
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26...-ban-block.html The court made clear that a limited version of the policy can be enforced immediately with a full hearing to come in the Fall. "An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded,” the court wrote. “As to these individuals and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”