Allan-Herbie Report post Posted July 24, 2009 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmurcie Report post Posted July 24, 2009 The GTR looked like it wasn't even trying. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topjay Report post Posted July 24, 2009 The figures recorded for it: Veyron GTR SV 0-60 2.8 3.9 3.2 0-100 5.8 8.4 7.3 0-150 12.0 20.6 15.4 0-170 16.2 32.8 21.2 0-200 28.6 1/4 Mile 10.5 12.1 11.4 MPH 140.2 121.1 129 Braking 100-0 4.3 4.1 4.2 Distance ft 293.6 272.5 286.9 EVO is a good read this month. They also tested the SV, it was 4 seconds a lap quicker than the LP640 and had an 8mph higher peak speed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
capitalista Report post Posted July 24, 2009 WOW at the end where the Veyron catches up to the GTR!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBGallardo Report post Posted July 24, 2009 Just as I thought! Veyron Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fortis Report post Posted July 24, 2009 It's all good but the GTR is the safer car, it's the slowest but stops the quickest Veyron is insane, effortless! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 25, 2009 The figures recorded for it: Veyron GTR SV 0-60 2.8 3.9 3.2 0-100 5.8 8.4 7.3 0-150 12.0 20.6 15.4 0-170 16.2 32.8 21.2 0-200 28.6 1/4 Mile 10.5 12.1 11.4 MPH 140.2 121.1 129 Braking 100-0 4.3 4.1 4.2 Distance ft 293.6 272.5 286.9 EVO is a good read this month. They also tested the SV, it was 4 seconds a lap quicker than the LP640 and had an 8mph higher peak speed. 4 seconds a lap? wow! great acceleration times too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted July 25, 2009 Very slow acceleration times for the Veyron... That means that my GTT beats the Veyron to 200mph by almost 10 seconds... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmax Report post Posted July 25, 2009 have they ever made GTT Vs Veyron? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 25, 2009 Very slow acceleration times for the Veyron... That means that my GTT beats the Veyron to 200mph by almost 10 seconds... indeed the Mclaren's 200 mph is 28 seconds, the Veyron should be substantially quicker (and it has been in other tests). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted July 25, 2009 indeed the Mclaren's 200 mph is 28 seconds, the Veyron should be substantially quicker (and it has been in other tests). In Road and Track it did it in 24 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 26, 2009 In Road and Track it did it in 24 in the ASS 0-300 test (the one with the LP640, SLR, FGT 599 etc) the Veyron did 186 mph in 18 seconds. would it really take another 6 seconds to do 14 mph for a car like the Veyron? or would the 0-200 time been better has they tested to it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted July 26, 2009 in the ASS 0-300 test (the one with the LP640, SLR, FGT 599 etc) the Veyron did 186 mph in 18 seconds. would it really take another 6 seconds to do 14 mph for a car like the Veyron? or would the 0-200 time been better has they tested to it? I dont think it would take 6 seconds... its also possible that a Euro Veyron is slightly different than a U.S. Veyron just like the Lp640's are. Is that the fastest 0-186 for a veyron? my car did it in 16.9... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 26, 2009 I dont think it would take 6 seconds... its also possible that a Euro Veyron is slightly different than a U.S. Veyron just like the Lp640's are. Is that the fastest 0-186 for a veyron? my car did it in 16.9... for the Veyron thats the only 0-186 time I know. though the factory quotes a 16.x Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LamboFighter Report post Posted July 27, 2009 That SV numbers are impressive. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 29, 2009 what was the LP670s lap time anyways? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topjay Report post Posted July 29, 2009 A selection: Caparo 114.8 Caterham levante 119.6 LP670 121.3 Atom 121.5 Scuderia 121.7 Lp5660 122.5 GT2 123.5 GTR 123.6 LP640 125.1 M3 125.9 Evo x fq300 129.3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin2772 Report post Posted July 29, 2009 A selection: Caparo 114.8 Caterham levante 119.6 LP670 121.3 Atom 121.5 Scuderia 121.7 Lp5660 122.5 GT2 123.5 GTR 123.6 LP640 125.1 M3 125.9 Evo x fq300 129.3 What do these speeds represent? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 29, 2009 I believe those are lap times. 122.5 = 1:22.5, right? and so a 1:21.3 for the LP670 equal their Enzo lap time. however the track went through some changes AFAIK. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topjay Report post Posted July 29, 2009 Yes the figures are lap times at Bedford Autodrome. eg 1 minute xx seconds. Do you want the peak speed for the laps as it is quoted as well? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 29, 2009 sure! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topjay Report post Posted July 29, 2009 A selection: Time, Peak Speed Caparo, 114.8, 130.9 Caterham levante, 119.6, 118.6 LP670, 121.3, 121.1 Atom, 121.5, 113.6 Scuderia, 121.7, 117.2 Lp5660, 122.5, 119.1 GT2, 123.5, 115.1 GTR, 123.6, 113.1 LP640, 125.1, 113.1 M3, 125.9, 108.8 Evo x fq300, 129.3, 99.3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 29, 2009 thanks! I would imagine the LP640 should be peaking higher than a GTR. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted July 31, 2009 I read that the LP640 time was on a partialy wet track. that would explain it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Z07 Report post Posted August 9, 2009 EVO is a good read this month. They also tested the SV, it was 4 seconds a lap quicker than the LP640 and had an 8mph higher peak speed. What's interesting is that the test weight for the LP640 was 1805kg and the test weight for the LP670 SV was 1541kg. Way more than the difference the manufacturer claims! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.