Jump to content

McLaren MP4 VS Aventador Vs Porsche CGT


fastlane
 Share

Recommended Posts

Highly doubtful, unless you are saying the Aventador is slower than an MP4...

Up to a 100mph it might be close to even, but beyond that, game over.

 

 

I'm not saying anything that the real world hasn't shown on video. Watch the videos in post 1. That's not the first set of videos with that result.

 

Anyhow, here is the acceleration data someone posted between their MP4 and their F12.

 

MP4-12C:

0-100 km/h - 3,2s

0-200 km/h - 8,8s

0-300 km/h - 28,4s

 

F12 berlinetta:

0-100 km/h - 3,3s

0-200 km/h - 8,5s

0-300 km/h - 22,1s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Highly doubtful, unless you are saying the Aventador is slower than an MP4...

Up to a 100mph it might be close to even, but beyond that, game over.

Aventador is certainly slower than Mp4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Highly doubtful, unless you are saying the Aventador is slower than an MP4...

Up to a 100mph it might be close to even, but beyond that, game over.

 

Did you even watch the videos? You know the ones which everybody is discussing in this thread?...

 

ok might be stupid question but watching the cgt run why did the rimes and tires stop moving while driving

 

It's called the strobe effect. The camera takes x numbers of frames/sec (is 48 the standard?) and this makes the wheels look like they go backwards/stop sometimes.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aventador is certainly slower than Mp4

 

If you say so. Have never lost out to one out of 4 separate half mile airstrip runs with 2 separate MP4s...one of them even had a fabspeed x-pipe system. My paddle shifting skills must be l33t.

 

Neither had a tune that's for sure. I think my avg speed trap was 162mph.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok might be stupid question but watching the cgt run why did the rimes and tires stop moving while driving

It's called the strobe effect. The camera takes x numbers of frames/sec (is 48 the standard?) and this makes the wheels look like they go backwards/stop sometimes.

a bit offtopic but here's a cool video showing that effect

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

let's see some videos.... I think it's close, but the odds are ever in the 12C's favor.....

 

 

If you say so. Have never lost out to one out of 4 separate half mile airstrip runs with 2 separate MP4s...one of them even had a fabspeed x-pipe system. My paddle shifting skills must be l33t.

 

Neither had a tune that's for sure. I think my avg speed trap was 162mph.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you say so. Have never lost out to one out of 4 separate half mile airstrip runs with 2 separate MP4s...one of them even had a fabspeed x-pipe system. My paddle shifting skills must be l33t.

 

Neither had a tune that's for sure. I think my avg speed trap was 162mph.

Is this on xbox?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this on xbox?

 

You're so funny.

 

I didn't record vids but Turbo-Jay (w the blue mp4) has it on his Facebook. We did several runs. Is there a way to save his videos onto my hard drive?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CGT did much better than I thought and seemed to give up a little on each shift which is expected. Great races for sure but I thought aventador would have been faster. Any races with CGT and lambo?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...