lambornima Report post Posted October 20, 2011 TEST - Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 Engine: V12, 700 hp, 690 Nm Drive: AWD, 7-speed-sequential gearbox Tyres: Pirelli P Zero Corsa Weight: 1831 kg Vmax.: 350 km/h 0-40 km/h: 1,1 s 0-100 km/h: 3,1 s 0-160 km/h: 6,3 s 0-200 km/h: 9,4 s 0-300 km/h: 24,8 s 400 m: 10,8 s (214 km/h) Flexibility 60-100 km/h in 4th/5th/6th gear: 3,2 s/4,3 s/6,2 s Flexibility 80-120 km/h in 5th/6th/7th gear: 4,0 s/5,5 s/6,8 s Braking 100-0 km/h (cold/warm): 33,0 m/32,7 m 18 m slalom: 68,4 km/h 110 m ISO evasive test: 152,9 km/h Average fuel consumption: 24,8 l/100 km and since its a German magazine I think they dont use 1-foot rollouts. Going by memory, their 0-100 time is 0.1 seconds quicker than the SV, the 200 time is a full second quicker and the 300 time is 5 seconds quicker. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
q8ylambo Report post Posted October 20, 2011 the 0-300 km/h is pretty good, the rest could be better Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 20, 2011 10.90@133.. decent.. nothing special.. Stock Turbo S, in the hands of a person with zero track experience, on a normal warm day just went 10.73 @ the dragstrip. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
turboad Report post Posted October 20, 2011 So much for the 2.9 0-60...Im pretty sure it would do better in other mags Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
asscelerator Report post Posted October 20, 2011 The thing is, this wasn't done on a dragstrip, more like a normal or even a runway type surface Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 20, 2011 The thing is, this wasn't done on a dragstrip, more like a normal or even a runway type surface Yes on a dragstrip would be SLOWER Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
turboad Report post Posted October 21, 2011 I have seen other cars timings vary around 0.3 secs on different magazine tests. To me, that video of the aventador racing the tt gallardo proves this cars performance over any magazine numbers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted October 21, 2011 For the Turbo S, the quickest times I found from a German magazine was Autozeitung with 0-100 in 3 seconds and 0-200 in 10.1. All of the others had 0-200 in mid to low 10s and mid to high 10s for the Turbo (non-S). For this particular magazine the 570 Superleggera and the 458 were both slower to 100 by a couple of tenths and about a full second slower to 200. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
turboad Report post Posted October 21, 2011 Maybe because they used an iphone. ....ok this joke is getting pretty old now Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 I have seen other cars timings vary around 0.3 secs on different magazine tests. To me, that video of the aventador racing the tt gallardo proves this cars performance over any magazine numbers. It only seems fast to you because in your head you are thinking of the awesome performance that a GTT is capable of. However that GTT has only run 135mph in the 1/4 ( on Vbox I believe) and it is still pulling away from the Aventador. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 For the Turbo S, the quickest times I found from a German magazine was Autozeitung with 0-100 in 3 seconds and 0-200 in 10.1. All of the others had 0-200 in mid to low 10s and mid to high 10s for the Turbo (non-S). For this particular magazine the 570 Superleggera and the 458 were both slower to 100 by a couple of tenths and about a full second slower to 200. You havent looked very far.. Like I said.. On 6speed.. bone stock Turbo S, at dragsrtip [email protected].. On a vbox it would show a higher mph.. New Road and Track... 2.84 0-60 and a 10.9@128mph 1/4, in their previous road test of the Turbo S they went 0-60 in 2.6, 0-100 in 6.3, amd 10.7@129..... Im sure from a roll the Aventador is faster then the Turbo S, but just how much faster remains to be seen.. From a dead stop the Porsche has nothing to fear.. especially with a 1.58 60ft.. Also, didnt Lambo claim 0-200 in 8.9? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
asscelerator Report post Posted October 21, 2011 That trap speed is slow as hell, the Aventador would be pulling like a banshee. Dragstrips are prepped, they are faster than a shit road, and they use rollout. I think these will be the slowest times seen on magazine. Auto Motor has consistently had slower acceleration times than other mags. Others will do 0-200 in 9 flat Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted October 21, 2011 You havent looked very far.. Like I said.. On 6speed.. bone stock Turbo S, at dragsrtip [email protected].. On a vbox it would show a higher mph.. New Road and Track... 2.84 0-60 and a 10.9@128mph 1/4, in their previous road test of the Turbo S they went 0-60 in 2.6, 0-100 in 6.3, amd 10.7@129..... Im sure from a roll the Aventador is faster then the Turbo S, but just how much faster remains to be seen.. From a dead stop the Porsche has nothing to fear.. especially with a 1.58 60ft.. Also, didnt Lambo claim 0-200 in 8.9? Ya, the car didnt meet lambo's 100 or 200 claims but did meet the 300 time. Also, if its going to be used for comparison reasons, Im trying to compare german tests to german tests (preferably the same mag to keep testing procedures equal). The italian magazines will likely get better times and so will the US magazines (consider that this magazine getting 11.4@128 mph for the SV while R&T got 10.9@129). Just trying to keep things on an equal playing level, hence I quoted Turbo S, SV, 458 and SuperG times from this magazine. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 That trap speed is slow as hell, the Aventador would be pulling like a banshee. Dragstrips are prepped, they are faster than a shit road, and they use rollout. I think these will be the slowest times seen on magazine. Auto Motor has consistently had slower acceleration times than other mags. Others will do 0-200 in 9 flat The Aventador wont be pulling on shit from a stop... The prepped dragstrip wont do much for 4wheel drive car.. And the Aventadors mph is not taken from a dragstrip. If it was it would be SLOWER than the 133 posted.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 Ya, the car didnt meet lambo's 100 or 200 claims but did meet the 300 time. Also, if its going to be used for comparison reasons, Im trying to compare german tests to german tests (preferably the same mag to keep testing procedures equal). The italian magazines will likely get better times and so will the US magazines (consider that this magazine getting 11.4@128 mph for the SV while R&T got 10.9@129). Just trying to keep things on an equal playing level, hence I quoted Turbo S, SV, 458 and SuperG times from this magazine. But we also have the canadian guy going 0-100 in mid 6's.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
q8ylambo Report post Posted October 21, 2011 You havent looked very far.. Like I said.. On 6speed.. bone stock Turbo S, at dragsrtip [email protected].. On a vbox it would show a higher mph.. New Road and Track... 2.84 0-60 and a 10.9@128mph 1/4, in their previous road test of the Turbo S they went 0-60 in 2.6, 0-100 in 6.3, amd 10.7@129..... Im sure from a roll the Aventador is faster then the Turbo S, but just how much faster remains to be seen.. From a dead stop the Porsche has nothing to fear.. especially with a 1.58 60ft.. Also, didnt Lambo claim 0-200 in 8.9? the turbo S does 0-300km/h in 34s so the aventador is 10 SECONDS faster to 300km/h, i don't know why you are comparing the turbo s to the aventador Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee Report post Posted October 21, 2011 HOLY SHIT! The weight of that thing is MASSIVE! 4030lbs?? Almost as fat as the murcielago! CRAZY! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
livinroo Report post Posted October 21, 2011 Weight: 1831 kg?????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRANSAMERA Report post Posted October 21, 2011 the turbo S does 0-300km/h in 34s so the aventador is 10 SECONDS faster to 300km/h, i don't know why you are comparing the turbo s to the aventador I would rather have a vent and a door without wheels and windows than a Porsche Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 the turbo S does 0-300km/h in 34s so the aventador is 10 SECONDS faster to 300km/h, i don't know why you are comparing the turbo s to the aventador I dont know what a Turbo S does 0-300Kmh... But in the real world no one races to 300Kmh.. Where I live... The Aventador driver will pull up to the light,, and next to him a Turbo S.. In that world.. the Turbo S has nothing to worry about.. And the good thing is... there is a new Turbo on the horizon.. But hey, lets take the turbo out the equation and bring up the Mclaren Mp4.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 I would rather have a vent and a door without wheels and windows than a Porsche Well if its the gay kind of porsche you buy, I would too! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 I would rather have a vent and a door without wheels and windows than a Porsche Well if its the gay kind of porsche you buy, I would too! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smash Boy Report post Posted October 21, 2011 10.90@133.. decent.. nothing special.. Stock Turbo S, in the hands of a person with zero track experience, on a normal warm day just went 10.73 @ the dragstrip. Seriously??? Wow, I had no idea they were that quick. Is this with PDK, tip or manual? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 21, 2011 Seriously??? Wow, I had no idea they were that quick. Is this with PDK, tip or manual? PDK... Owner says he thinks it will go quicker, especially on a cooler day. This was his first and only time ever launching the car.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albert-LP Report post Posted October 21, 2011 Aventator is the fastest NA car in the world: 10.80 s in the 1/4 mile is very impressive, the 0-300 km/h time even more. And then it must be said that there are cars that go beyond a stupid number, giving an enormous satisfaction to its owner even when the car is just parked: Aventador is one of them and there is no Porsche or Nissan that can do the same. ciao Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.