lambornima

Huh? :-s the Pro-Street Camaro did a 11.8@114. the best ive seen a Murcielago do is 11.7@123 :twisted: but ive heard that with a perfect launch and switches, 11.6 is possible.

hah! that comaro would have been beaten by a stock murcielago

I just concluded from the numbers ive seen. with a beaten clutch it did 200 km/h in the same time it takes a murcielago either way I havnt driven the cars - heck I have even ridden in a lambo yet - heck I dont even have my license!

id still have the f50

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/videos/nasty_toe.html

the diablo GT is faster than a Murc in the straight and 100 kg lighter http://www.autospinetti.it/suppl.%20sito%2...etti/gt-550.htm So im guessing with the right driver the diablo 6.0VT would be faster than both a diablo GT and a Murcielago in the straight. either way they still would rip apart an F50, even if it was driven by MS http://www.autospinetti.it/suppl.%20sito%2...ti/f50%204r.htm :finga: :twisted:

it would get beaten by a little bit, imo.. diablo GTR would wipe then out though :twisted: but its not street legal the murcielago would be the best match against an F40 or FGT. how is the handling of the Diablo 6.0VT compared to the Murccielago? I hear that the Murcielago is much better than a diablo in terms of handling, but this was from Allan and im pretty sure he was comparing his SV to his Murc. so what about the post-audi diablo? were there any major changes or is the murcielago better than it around the curves too? considering the Murcielago gets to 200km/h in the mid 12s and 240 km/h in 18.4 seconds, I would say the Diablo 6.0VT get a time in the 17s to 240 km/h. consider the two articles: this is from C/D and they got too 200 km/h in 11.8 seconds despite a beaten clutch(hense the "slow" 0-100 time) http://img63.imageshack.us/my.php?loc=img6...41large29ii.jpg this is a murcielago test and they got to 200 in 12.4 and to 250 in 18.4 http://www.autospinetti.it/suppl.%20sito%2...tti/Murci4r.htm

with the wieght of that car, which is probably less than a paperbag, I think they could have done better, mainly on the launches. 0-100 km.h in 5 seconds isnt too god for the car.

probably has a gear change somewhere between 80-100

No "actually" about it. My time is for a US car as I noted, yours is for a Euro car. What magazine got that time out of curiosity, it's fast for even a Euro. http://www.autospinetti.it/suppl.%20sito%2...tti/f40auto.htm http://www.autospinetti.it/suppl.%20sito%2...ti/f40%204r.htm I hate to say it but the F40 would beat almost any roadlegal lambo in a striaght line.

why dont they just call it the 600?

actually the F40 did 0-150 in 16.* seconds

no serisouly? LV eric says he might get one, who else?

they love every ferrari :roll:

so who on this forum is planning to buy one?

I thought the murcielago looked chubby

:supz: :supz: :supz: :prayer: :supz: :prayer: :supz: :prayer: :prayer: :prayer: :prayer: :twisted: are you realy getting one?

He probably has 1 zillion H2s and more importantly, he has a murcielago

Speedo error must be huge on the 360 because the one that I had (with only a Hamann exhaust as a performance upgrade) read 205 on the freeway when I was testing it and I was only at 7900rpm (600 to go to redline)! you could have also have been going downhill.

its Nardo time!!!! :mrgreen:

if its downhill, is downhill. the manufacturers test on level ground. Also, I beleive that speedometers are often indicate a faster speed, so if you are going 105 according to the speedo, you would be going roughly about 100.

:vom: :vom: :vom: :vom: :vom: :vom: :vom: :vom: :vom:

you got a link!? pleeeeease can I have it too?

how much would 435 translate to at the crank? above 500?