xavibass Report post Posted April 1, 2009 V8 6,2 Liter 0-100km/h - 4,5s Torque: 630 Nm . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilipinoStig Report post Posted April 1, 2009 Front looks like a Lexus GS, rear looks like a Hyundai or Honda. I'm sure if I drove it, my opinion would change - but I don't like the design changes from a glance... it looks too Japanese. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pockmark Report post Posted April 1, 2009 Front looks like a Lexus GS, rear looks like a Hyundai or Honda. I'm sure if I drove it, my opinion would change - but I don't like the design changes from a glance... it looks too Japanese. I was thinking the exact same thing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benkei Report post Posted April 1, 2009 I liked the side of the hood. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecyrax Report post Posted April 1, 2009 From the front and back, it looks like 2 different cars. I love the front, hate the back.... I hope they make an AMG version of the coupe! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LamboFighter Report post Posted April 1, 2009 CLS all the way baby!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjsmd Report post Posted April 1, 2009 Like the interior, hate the exterior. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GR8-1 Report post Posted April 2, 2009 looks like Benz is hopping on BMW's "Let's make our new cars ugly" bandwagon. It's a Kia in the back, and a crashed Lexus in the front. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VCR Report post Posted April 2, 2009 Front looks like a Lexus GS, rear looks like a Hyundai or Honda. I'm sure if I drove it, my opinion would change - but I don't like the design changes from a glance... it looks too Japanese. That about sums it up spot on except it's Japanese-8-years-ago/current-Korean. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benkei Report post Posted April 6, 2009 I wouldn't pay over $60,000 for this car if that. Looks like a cheap piece of shit. Very plasticy interior, ford looking dash/shifter, etc. Way to fcuk it up Mercedes. Guess EVERYBODY is having cutbacks, because I would rather have the current C63 over that thing. Probably cost over $90,000 with options. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Wiggs Report post Posted April 6, 2009 That car looks about as awe-inspiring as an egg salad sandwich. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
57udl3y Report post Posted April 6, 2009 it is very awkwardly shaped, but a lot of that is due down to them extensively designing it so it would have the lowest drag coefficient of any production car, i think it was any production car Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFilipinoStig Report post Posted April 6, 2009 That car looks about as awe-inspiring as an egg salad sandwich. In that price range, or even lease range, I can think of a myriad of other DD's that look better both inside and out. Look at the front drivers right leg, are those controls or inputs ala the G35??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentS Report post Posted April 6, 2009 Did they hire an ex Hyundai or Kia designer? The interior isn't too bad, but the exterior is hideous... And this $90k+ thing is going to be a $50k car as soon as you drive it off the lot. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben Report post Posted April 6, 2009 Nice Caddy CTS. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted April 6, 2009 Wonder if theyd lease i to JUIcee Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LagunaRacer Report post Posted April 7, 2009 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
murclovr Report post Posted April 7, 2009 Caddy CTS looks way better! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralfabco Report post Posted April 14, 2009 I would rather have the current C63 over that thing. I would rather have the original 6.3. That was a "real" Mercedes. If you want the best sedan, pick up an original 1970's 600. That was the best saloon built by man . M.B., has built junk for the most part, over the last ten to fifteen years. This car is horrible. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZIGGYSECC Report post Posted April 14, 2009 I definitely like the C63 better but this one does have some interesting technology... The safety equipment on the E63 AMG is top drawer, including seven airbags, Neck-Pro head restraints, the PreSafe occupant protection system and a new drowsiness detection system called Attention Assist. Mercedes-Benz also offers such safety-related options as Lane Keeping Assist, Blind Spot Assist, Adaptive Highbeam Assist, Night View Assist and Speed Limit Assist. http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/autoshow...e63amgnews.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OVI Report post Posted August 27, 2009 Front looks like a Lexus GS, rear looks like a Hyundai Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chipster Report post Posted August 27, 2009 Impressive stats but I still hate the new E class body style Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.