Castor Troy Report post Posted June 20, 2008 Van Weed Monkey is in deep shit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt_chaos Report post Posted June 20, 2008 I know this is much different from the Canadian system in particular, where defendants names are protected from the press, etc... I wrote a law review article on the differences between the Canadian system and the US System in Law School.... I like the U.S. system more. From my understanding the Canadian system has strong links (naturally) with the French legal system; which imo and experience is really shit - I am going through some stuff now to do with my family in France. Yes the US system imo is better than the French/Canadian system in general but I really am shocked that such a revelation is released, surely a prosecutor would include this only in the trial and not prior to prevent the defendant claiming an unfair trial. I am not saying that the trials are held in private I am just surprised that details of the parties involved are release to the public domain prior to the trial. But anyway we are diverting away from the topic content... still interesting though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveH Report post Posted June 20, 2008 The Canadian and US systems are fairly close. The names of young offenders or victims who are minors cannot be released, everything else is fair game. 80% of Canada is based off a common law system, which is english. Quebec is based off the civil law code, which is french. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim501 Report post Posted June 21, 2008 From my understanding the Canadian system has strong links (naturally) with the French legal system; which imo and experience is really shit - I am going through some stuff now to do with my family in France. Yes the US system imo is better than the French/Canadian system in general but I really am shocked that such a revelation is released, surely a prosecutor would include this only in the trial and not prior to prevent the defendant claiming an unfair trial. I am not saying that the trials are held in private I am just surprised that details of the parties involved are release to the public domain prior to the trial. But anyway we are diverting away from the topic content... still interesting though. I've always wondered about this. Why does it make when the jurors receive the information. As long as it's ture then it wouldn't matter if they hear it before or during the trial, they would still make the same conclusion? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camel Toe Juice Report post Posted June 21, 2008 Would someones insurance umbrella policy take care of all this mess? If he had a 3 million dollar policy I would think he would be ok financially but with weed in the scenario it might be a different ball game. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livre Report post Posted June 21, 2008 The Canadian and US systems are fairly close. The names of young offenders or victims who are minors cannot be released, everything else is fair game. 80% of Canada is based off a common law system, which is english. Quebec is based off the civil law code, which is french. This is correct. The Canadian system is mostly based on the British legal system (or was atleast). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abolfaz Report post Posted June 21, 2008 "The prosecution did not object as there is evidence that Van Brakel had trace amounts of Marijuana in his blood at the time of the accident. This could mean more charges and a new Grand Jury will allow the expansion of charges." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBGallardo Report post Posted June 21, 2008 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
patbarrett Report post Posted August 8, 2008 Saw this on AZcentral.com http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/200...holman0807.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted August 8, 2008 Theyre fucked. And what happened to Juicee63? He dissapeared! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff SD Report post Posted August 8, 2008 Theyre fucked.! With this kind of driving record they don't stand a chance.. Court records shows that Aronica has been cited nine times for speeding and once each for careless and reckless driving since 2001. Aronica has been cited in Michigan, Virginia, Florida and Maryland. Five months before Holman's death, Aronica was cited for reckless driving for going 84 mph in a 65 mph zone in Greensville County, Va. Aronia paid $906 in speeding tickets in six of the 11 cases. Fine amounts weren't available in the other five. Van Brakel has a less-extensive driving record, but reached higher speeds. In November 2004, he was clocked driving 120 mph in a 75 mph zone on Interstate 17 near Mayer. He told the officer he was "trying out a new car," records shows. The ticket cost him $480. In June 2004, Van Brakel paid a $293 fine for driving 67 mph in a 40 mph zone in Scottsdale. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juicee63 Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Theyre fucked. And what happened to Juicee63? He dissapeared! I thought the case was dismissed, at least that is what i read on the Maricopa County website. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted September 29, 2008 I thought the case was dismissed, at least that is what i read on the Maricopa County website. HAHA ya you wish... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abolfaz Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Dismissed?! WTF? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
juicee63 Report post Posted September 29, 2008 HAHA ya you wish... CR2007-182613-002 SE 09/25/2008 Docket Code 042 Form R000D Page 1 CLERK OF THE COURT HON. TERESA SANDERS M. Brown Deputy STATE OF ARIZONA GREGORY R BIZZOZERO MATTHEW PATRICK MACLEOD v. ROBERT HANK VAN BRAKEL (002) ROBERT L STORRS DISPOSITION CLERK-CSC VICTIM SERVICES DIV-CA-SE MINUTE ENTRY CASE DISMISSED Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted September 29, 2008 CR2007-182613-002 SE 09/25/2008 Docket Code 042 Form R000D Page 1 CLERK OF THE COURT HON. TERESA SANDERS M. Brown Deputy STATE OF ARIZONA GREGORY R BIZZOZERO MATTHEW PATRICK MACLEOD v. ROBERT HANK VAN BRAKEL (002) ROBERT L STORRS DISPOSITION CLERK-CSC VICTIM SERVICES DIV-CA-SE MINUTE ENTRY CASE DISMISSED Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bashir26 Report post Posted September 29, 2008 are you in disbelief or is the case not dismissed? I personally think its BS and that he should go to jail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted September 29, 2008 are you in disbelief or is the case not dismissed? I personally think its BS and that he should go to jail. Sure, drag racing cases involving... death, drugs and multiple prior infractions usually get dismissed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Case wasnt exactly dismissed.... It was dismissed so that it could be REFILED.... Probably with the new drug charges people were talking about... Here is the new case number... They are still VERY MUCH in the system, and if anything, the case has only gotten worse. http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/dock...r=CR2008-031157 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Report post Posted September 29, 2008 And for those playing at home... Here is the CIVIL case: http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/dock...r=CV2008-003896 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest skokos Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Good. I about spit out my dinner when I read it was dismissed. Im glad they are refilling it with the new added charges Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Confirmed... They tacked on DUI to Van Fuckstick.... http://www.kpho.com/news/17564187/detail.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Now Juicefag can go back into his hole. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Now Juicefag can go back into his hole. BTW... Juice.... your avatar violates our avatar policy.... And since youve proved time and again youre a member of the Blueballs cult, Im giving you the "Elrond Hubbard of Rivendale" avatar. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destructo Report post Posted September 29, 2008 Confirmed... They tacked on DUI to Van Fuckstick.... http://www.kpho.com/news/17564187/detail.html I hope they get the absolute book thrown at them, in every way possible. A pathetic excuse for a human. Not to mention the pictures affirm that they definitely look the part. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.