Ascari_2 Report post Posted October 25, 2011 Quattroruote Italy Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 0 - 100km/h: 2.89s 0 - 200km/h: 8.96s 0 - 400m (1/4 mile): 10.58s @ 216km/h (134mph) 0 - 1000m (1km): 19.18s @ 278.94 (173.3mph) Ferrari 599 GTO 0 - 100km/h: 3.79s 0 - 200km/h: 10.21s 0 - 400m (1/4 mile): 11.46s @ 213km/h (132mph) 0 - 1000m (1km): 20.24s @ 271.54 (168.7mph) McLaren MP4-12C 0 - 100km/h: 3.14s 0 - 200km/h: 9.05s 0 - 400m (1/4 mile): 10.77s @ 216km/h (134mph) 0 - 1000m (1km): 19.44s @ 271.60 (168.7mph) Porsche 997 GT3 RS 4.0 0 - 100km/h: 3.84s 0 - 200km/h: 11.70s 0 - 400m (1/4 mile): 11.77s @ 200.45km/h (124mph) 0 - 1000m (1km): 21.21s @ 250.26 (155.5mph) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LyinFapper Report post Posted October 25, 2011 thats fast Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted October 25, 2011 thats fast Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
VBUGKING Report post Posted October 25, 2011 Nice numbers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mv Report post Posted October 25, 2011 As usual no 1-foot rollout. Translating into Motor Trend/Car and Driver/Road and Track methodology they got : 0-60mph - 2,4s 1/4mile - 10,3s @ 134mph Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 25, 2011 Nice numbers.. In the 1/4 the MP-4 has a higher trap... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
q8ylambo Report post Posted October 25, 2011 Nice numbers.. In the 1/4 the MP-4 has a higher trap... how 134 mph is higher than 134 mph ???? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 25, 2011 how 134 mph is higher than 134 mph ???? 216.37 is HIGHER than 216.18 Is it.. or is it not.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DickSimmons Report post Posted October 25, 2011 216.37 is HIGHER than 216.18 Is it.. or is it not.. LOL. 1/10 mph. The wind changing direction probably makes more than much of a difference. You are really stretchin' it here to make the 12C come out as being better anyway you can it seems. It stayed rough .2s behind all the way up to 1000m and at that point was rough 5mph slower. Both are very quick, but I think the Aventador's 134mph is faster than the 12C's. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 25, 2011 LOL. 1/10 mph. The wind changing direction probably makes more than much of a difference. You are really stretchin' it here to make the 12C come out as being better anyway you can it seems. Just pointing the facts... Not to mention if history is repeated the U.S. Aventador will be slower than the Euro car due to the addition of additional cats, just like Euro Murcis had 2, as did the Euro Diablo, and the U.S. models had 4.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 25, 2011 LOL. 1/10 mph. The wind changing direction probably makes more than much of a difference. You are really stretchin' it here to make the 12C come out as being better anyway you can it seems. It stayed rough .2s behind all the way up to 1000m and at that point was rough 5mph slower. Both are very quick, but I think the Aventador's 134mph is faster than the 12C's. So you think 134.16 is faster than 134.37.. OK.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DickSimmons Report post Posted October 25, 2011 So you think 134.16 is faster than 134.37.. OK.. No, not really, I just think that the 1/10mph difference can be ignored and that the Aventador will be going faster than it rather soon, being that over the next 600m it is up 4.5 mph. As for the US spec being slower, I dunno. Maybe. Who knows? Though if the US spec Aventador is slower, why wouldn't the US spec McLaren be as well? Completely unrelated, I'd just like to say you're crazy if you spend $400-500K on a 599 GTO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 26, 2011 No, not really, I just think that the 1/10mph difference can be ignored and that the Aventador will be going faster than it rather soon, being that over the next 600m it is up 4.5 mph. As for the US spec being slower, I dunno. Maybe. Who knows? Though if the US spec Aventador is slower, why wouldn't the US spec McLaren be as well? Completely unrelated, I'd just like to say you're crazy if you spend $400-500K on a 599 GTO. Because as far as I know the Mclaren is built the same for everywhere.. while the Lambo is not. I agree on the GTO.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
asscelerator Report post Posted October 26, 2011 Allan, sorry, but a 458 would get dusted so hard it wouldn't know where either the McLaren or the Aventador went. I don't think you actually know whether or not the Aventador is any different in the US than in Europe. I would guess not, Euro emissions standards are far above US right now, and there is a reason for that huge exhaust box and fanatical engine control; it passes Euro 5 level 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan-Herbie Report post Posted October 26, 2011 Allan, sorry, but a 458 would get dusted so hard it wouldn't know where either the McLaren or the Aventador went. I don't think you actually know whether or not the Aventador is any different in the US than in Europe. I would guess not, Euro emissions standards are far above US right now, and there is a reason for that huge exhaust box and fanatical engine control; it passes Euro 5 level 2 Both the Diablo and Murcielago, which also have the huge exhaust box were different.. We will see when we look underneath the Aventador.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
turboad Report post Posted October 26, 2011 The fax machine is hanging better than i expected. Cant wait to see real life videos comparing the two. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted October 26, 2011 Ive heard that they tested the LP to be almost a second quicker around their track than the Macca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
asscelerator Report post Posted October 26, 2011 As far as I can tell, it was a 1:38.8 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
q8ylambo Report post Posted October 26, 2011 Vairano Handling: 1.13:860 - 124.78 Kph - Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 NEW LAP RECORD 1.14:815 - 123.18 kph - McLaren MP4-12C 1.16:087 - 121.12 Kph - Ferrari 599 GTO 1.16:389 - 120.65 Kph - Porsche 997.2 GT3 RS 4.0 500ps Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluedemon Report post Posted October 26, 2011 Some additional info: http://www.germancarforum.com/internal-com...html#post541743 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placid Report post Posted October 26, 2011 As usual no 1-foot rollout. Translating into Motor Trend/Car and Driver/Road and Track methodology they got : 0-60mph - 2,4s 1/4mile - 10,3s @ 134mph What exactly is a 1-foot rollout? Starting the timer after 1 foot, or rolling slowly 1 foot before flooring it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee Report post Posted October 26, 2011 From the numbers it looks like the McLaren and the Aventador would be virtually identical from a roll. The Lambo seems to have the advantage from dig because of the awd but that´s about it. What I find really surprings though is that it is quicker around the track than the faxmachine? Hard to believe with the additional weight the aventador packs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DickSimmons Report post Posted October 26, 2011 Impressive indeed. If these cars do pretty much have the same performance for straight line speeds/accelerations you'd see on a track (0-250kmh,) then it's pretty damn impressive that the 4000 lb Lamborghini is quicker around it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambornima Report post Posted October 26, 2011 From the numbers it looks like the McLaren and the Aventador would be virtually identical from a roll. The Lambo seems to have the advantage from dig because of the awd but that´s about it. What I find really surprings though is that it is quicker around the track than the faxmachine? Hard to believe with the additional weight the aventador packs. Well from recent tests the aventador is 5-6 seconds quicker to 300 (albeit not in the same conditions). Given similar 0-200 times it looks like beyond that the aventador is much quicker...which makes sense given a 100 hp advantage that it can use to overcome air resistance. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lee Report post Posted October 26, 2011 That´s what´s strange, from this test we can see that both seem to be equal up to 200 and that the LP seems to pull slightly from 200 to 250(0.4s) so how can there be a difference of more then 6sec from 250-300?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.