Auto Motor und Sport test results!

Must be a lot of potential for a lightweight edition... Damn that's heavy!

 

0-124MPH (200KPH) RESULTS

9.3 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

9.4 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

9.6 - MCLAREN F1

9.8 - PAGANI ZONDA F

10.0 - PORSCHE 911 TURBO S (997.2)

10.3 - FERRARI ENZO

10.4 - FERRARI 458

10.5 - PORSCHE 911 GT1 LM (ROAD VERSION)

10.5 - MERCEDES SLR 722

10.7 - LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO LP570-4 SL

10.7 - PORSCHE CARERRA GT

10.7 - LAMBORGHINI LP640

11.0 - MERCEDES-MCLAREN SLR

11.1 - MERCEDES SLS

 

 

0-186MPH (300KPH) RESULTS

14.9 - BUGATTI VEYRON SS

16.7 - BUGATTI VEYRON

21.9 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

22.3 - MCLAREN F1

24.8 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

26.1 - FERRARI ENZO

28.6 - PORSCHE 911 GT2RS (997.2)

29.6 - MERCEDES SLR

29.9 - FERRARI 599GTB

31.8 - LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO LP640

32.3 - LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO LP570-4 SL

33.6 - FORD GT

34.2 - PORSCHE CARRERA GT

 

 

Can't imagine how anyone looking for any performance figures would be somehow upset or disappointed in this showing...especially from a notoriously slow magazine that takes its time and provides controlled results...

The aventador out of the box is a fast car. You cant compare the aventador to the turbo s. Turbo s is a boring car to drive nomatter how fast it is, and while the mclaren might be fast who cares. That thing is named after a fax machine and looks like a honda nsx, styling is 10 years dated.

 

For anyone whos really concerned about numbers i suggest they buy a gtr, send it over to sp for the 1000 package and enjoy running high 9's all day on pump gas.

The aventador out of the box is a fast car. You cant compare the aventador to the turbo s. Turbo s is a boring car to drive nomatter how fast it is, and while the mclaren might be fast who cares. That thing is named after a fax machine and looks like a honda nsx, styling is 10 years dated.

 

For anyone whos really concerned about numbers i suggest they buy a gtr, send it over to sp for the 1000 package and enjoy running high 9's all day on pump gas.

 

+ the aventador is faster than the mp4-c12akdjociuajnp382u29y472y8o24

My only thought to the car's performance prior to these numbers was that I wanted it to suprass the Enzo's figures at all levels.

 

Not due to the rivalry between the marques, but because that's the technological progress I'd want to see if I were a buyer at that level: Surpass the best-performing of the last round of hypercars (mid-2000s) at half the price.

 

It's done that.

 

So the figures are strong to me, actually a bit faster than I expected probably as the 0-200kph mark is pretty amazing.

 

And I'll say this, it will be a tough assignment for the 599-replacement to surpass those numbers in a dramatic way. With KERS being left on the sideline for that car, along with deliveries of it being at LEAST two years away from today for any non-MULTI-Ferrari owners, I don't see the comparison being valid anyway.

 

It really has no peer right now or in the immediate future.

And I'll say this, it will be a tough assignment for the 599-replacement to surpass those numbers in a dramatic way. With KERS being left on the sideline for that car, along with deliveries of it being at LEAST two years away from today for any non-MULTI-Ferrari owners, I don't see the comparison being valid anyway.

 

It really has no peer right now or in the immediate future.

 

I agree, and when the 599 replacement will come lambo will probably have its revised aventador with direct injection and a reworked head ready to fight back.

 

Im just happy with the direction lambo is taking with its engines. While everybody is switching to forced induction for effeciency lambo are still sticking to sensational na powerplants. Look at the new m5, 63 mercs ,pagani huayra and the mp4 fax machine. Ok we know that turbos are cool and efficient, and really easy to tune with a chip. But they are never as good sounding or fun to drive as na cars.

 

I appreciate lambo for sticking to its roots and for caring about US the drivers instead of the environmentalists. There might be a turbo lambo comming in the near future, but atleast until then we can enjoy those wonderful na engines before they become extinct.

I agree, and when the 599 replacement will come lambo will probably have its revised aventador with direct injection and a reworked head ready to fight back.

I don't see Lambo putting new engine in the aventador in 2 years time , 4 years maybe but 2 years noway

Most probably but inevitably it will happen, not a new engine though a slightly reworked one

The weight has to be wrong! Isn't the Aventador somewhere around 1650kg or something? Either that or they have some fat ass journalist driver and passenger in there.

My only thought to the car's performance prior to these numbers was that I wanted it to suprass the Enzo's figures at all levels.

 

Not due to the rivalry between the marques, but because that's the technological progress I'd want to see if I were a buyer at that level: Surpass the best-performing of the last round of hypercars (mid-2000s) at half the price.

 

It's done that.

 

So the figures are strong to me, actually a bit faster than I expected probably as the 0-200kph mark is pretty amazing.

 

And I'll say this, it will be a tough assignment for the 599-replacement to surpass those numbers in a dramatic way. With KERS being left on the sideline for that car, along with deliveries of it being at LEAST two years away from today for any non-MULTI-Ferrari owners, I don't see the comparison being valid anyway.

 

It really has no peer right now or in the immediate future.

 

 

 

 

You got it right. Lamborghini has done an amazing job with the car.

I don't see Lambo putting new engine in the aventador in 2 years time , 4 years maybe but 2 years noway

 

 

As a member of the V.A.G Group I can confirm, that you will only see minor modifications the next 5 years.

The weight has to be wrong! Isn't the Aventador somewhere around 1650kg or something? Either that or they have some fat ass journalist driver and passenger in there.

The official website claims 1575 kg dry weight.

Here are some 12C and GT2 RS comparison numbers from Sport Auto. Blow the doors of an Aventador with a 12C? I think not.

 

Key metrics are as follows (test car with Pirelli Corsa and CCB brakes):

 

(GT2 RS stated as benchmark)

 

NBR: 7.28 (GT2 RS: 7.24) - Doettinger Hoehe 293kph (300kph)

 

HHR: 1.08,7 (1.08,4)

 

0-100kph: 3.4s (3.5s)

 

0-200kph: 9.8s (9.8s)

 

Weight of tested car: 1451kg (1405kg)

 

Cw: 0.37 (0.35)

 

CwxA: 0.72 (0.71)

 

Downforce at 200kph front: 2kg (14kg)

 

Downforce at 200kph rear: 62kg (35kg)

 

200-0: 144.2m (126.6m)

 

Wet handling: 1.38,7 (1.38,7)

 

36m slalom: 138kph (144kph)

 

110 meter test: 157kph (159kph)

 

0-300kph: 31s (included in the same issue of Sportauto, not Supertest though: GT3 RS 4.0 benchmark 41s)

I don't see Lambo putting new engine in the aventador in 2 years time , 4 years maybe but 2 years noway

New ENGINE?! wow that more than unnecessary!

New ENGINE?! wow that more than unnecessary!

i meant modified

Here are some 12C and GT2 RS comparison numbers from Sport Auto. Blow the doors of an Aventador with a 12C? I think not.

 

Excellent, added them into the lists:

 

0-124MPH (200KPH) RESULTS

9.3 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

9.4 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

9.6 - MCLAREN F1

9.8 - PAGANI ZONDA F

9.8 - MCLAREN MP4-12C FAX MACHINE

10.0 - PORSCHE 911 TURBO S (997.2)

10.3 - FERRARI ENZO

10.4 - FERRARI 458

10.5 - PORSCHE 911 GT1 LM (ROAD VERSION)

10.5 - MERCEDES SLR 722

10.7 - LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO LP570-4 SL

10.7 - PORSCHE CARERRA GT

10.7 - LAMBORGHINI LP640

11.0 - MERCEDES-MCLAREN SLR

11.1 - MERCEDES SLS

 

 

0-186MPH (300KPH) RESULTS

14.9 - BUGATTI VEYRON SS

16.7 - BUGATTI VEYRON

21.9 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

22.3 - MCLAREN F1

24.8 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

26.1 - FERRARI ENZO

28.6 - PORSCHE 911 GT2RS (997.2)

29.6 - MERCEDES SLR

29.9 - FERRARI 599GTB

31.0 - MCLAREN MP4-12C FAX MACHINE

31.8 - LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO LP640

32.3 - LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO LP570-4 SL

33.6 - FORD GT

34.2 - PORSCHE CARRERA GT

 

 

Excellent, added them into the lists:

 

0-124MPH (200KPH) RESULTS

9.3 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

9.4 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

9.6 - MCLAREN F1

9.8 - PAGANI ZONDA F

9.8 - MCLAREN MP4-12C FAX MACHINE

10.0 - PORSCHE 911 TURBO S (997.2)

10.3 - FERRARI ENZO

10.4 - FERRARI 458

10.5 - PORSCHE 911 GT1 LM (ROAD VERSION)

10.5 - MERCEDES SLR 722

10.7 - LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO LP570-4 SL

10.7 - PORSCHE CARERRA GT

10.7 - LAMBORGHINI LP640

11.0 - MERCEDES-MCLAREN SLR

11.1 - MERCEDES SLS

 

 

0-186MPH (300KPH) RESULTS

14.9 - BUGATTI VEYRON SS

16.7 - BUGATTI VEYRON

21.9 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

22.3 - MCLAREN F1

24.8 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

26.1 - FERRARI ENZO

28.6 - PORSCHE 911 GT2RS (997.2)

29.6 - MERCEDES SLR

29.9 - FERRARI 599GTB

31.0 - MCLAREN MP4-12C FAX MACHINE

31.8 - LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO LP640

32.3 - LAMBORGHINI GALLARDO LP570-4 SL

33.6 - FORD GT

34.2 - PORSCHE CARRERA GT

 

 

I will bet that the Mp4 is significantly faster than 31 sec to 186...

I will bet that the Mp4 is significantly faster than 31 sec to 186...

not faster than the aventador

As a member of the V.A.G Group I can confirm, that you will only see minor modifications the next 5 years.

 

 

A reworked head with direct injection, different cams and a free flowing exhaust falls under "minor modifications"

 

But lets not go that far into the future

 

0-124MPH (200KPH) RESULTS

9.3 - KOENIGSEGG CCX

9.4 - LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700

9.6 - MCLAREN F1

9.8 - PAGANI ZONDA F

9.8 - MCLAREN MP4-12C FAX MACHINE

 

This kind of performance should make owners happy for a few years to come

Here are some 12C and GT2 RS comparison numbers from Sport Auto. Blow the doors of an Aventador with a 12C? I think not.

 

Key metrics are as follows (test car with Pirelli Corsa and CCB brakes):

 

(GT2 RS stated as benchmark)

 

NBR: 7.28 (GT2 RS: 7.24) - Doettinger Hoehe 293kph (300kph)

 

HHR: 1.08,7 (1.08,4)

 

0-100kph: 3.4s (3.5s)

 

0-200kph: 9.8s (9.8s)

 

Weight of tested car: 1451kg (1405kg)

 

Cw: 0.37 (0.35)

 

CwxA: 0.72 (0.71)

 

Downforce at 200kph front: 2kg (14kg)

 

Downforce at 200kph rear: 62kg (35kg)

 

200-0: 144.2m (126.6m)

 

Wet handling: 1.38,7 (1.38,7)

 

36m slalom: 138kph (144kph)

 

110 meter test: 157kph (159kph)

 

0-300kph: 31s (included in the same issue of Sportauto, not Supertest though: GT3 RS 4.0 benchmark 41s)

 

The Porsche GT2 RS runs on Sport Cups, (sport cups are a little faster than p zero corsa). Anyways, McLaren seems to make a distinction, although the corsa is still considered a semi slick, it has a much more significant "tread" pattern

 

 

still hauls

 

I have $5000 in mods on my GTR and will have no trouble

 

 

But I still want one bad.

I have $5000 in mods on my GTR and will have no trouble

 

 

But I still want one bad.

 

 

But who gives a fark for the Datto.....

No one would notice the Datsun when the Aventador is next to it.

It is a stunning car.

The weight has to be wrong! Isn't the Aventador somewhere around 1650kg or something? Either that or they have some fat ass journalist driver and passenger in there.

 

 

Something is definitely off for the weight. I know of a car that was weighed at the airport loaded on the big metal pallet it ships on (which must weigh at least 75Kg or more) and the total weight was 1705kg (3758 lb). Where Auto Motor got their 1831kg weight from I have no idea.

Quattroruote Magazine measured the LP700 Weight: 1870 kg BUT this weight is with 100 kg load (test driver and instruments) and with full gasoline tank so the wet weight (with fluids but no gasoline) is about 1670 kg.

Not much for an AWD with 6,5 liter V12.

 

ciao

It is ALOT! No but's and if's !